WeAre138

What the killstreak order should look like - my vision for Call of Duty

Well, that's bullshit. I think they should go back to 3,5,7...but here's how I'd switch up the current killstreaks. I did this in bullet points. Some are the same...some lower

UAV - 3
Counter-UAV - 3 - Earn three kills for both. Would you rather jam their radar, or light up yours?
Care Package - 5 - With the chance to get Chopper Gunner or AC130, 5 seems more fitting than 4. Maybe you get shit....or maybe you reap a huge reward.
Predator Missile - 5
Precision Airstrike - 5 - Six was a fucking retarded number for this. The only chance people will use it is if it's the same kill count as Predator...even then.
Attack Helicopter - 7 - Won't ever compete with Harrier, rightfully so.
Harrier Strike - 7 - But reduce the damage....you've got no shot once it starts firing at you....I literally think it kills faster than Pavelow.
Emergency Airdrop - 8 - broken killstreak....make it easier to avoid the packages from hitting rooftops. Seriously, the only safe way is usually the middle of the map...where it's anyone's game.
EMP - 8 - If it lasted longer, I'd make it higher....just one minute though? 8 sounds like a nice number
Pavelow - 9
Chopper Gunner - 11
AC130 - 11
Tactical Nuke - 20 - Only twenty? Killstreaks shouldn't build, period. Doesn't it defeat the purpose? To avoid it being ridiculously hard, I lowered it to 20.

Alphabuster187

Thank goodness you are not in charge...

Nuke to hard to get??? Get real!

The only thing I would change, and it makes a whole lot more sense.

EMP - 11 kills
Chopper Gunner - 15 Kills
AC-130 - 15 kills
Nuke - 30 kills

__________________

Prestige: 10 / Rank: 70 / Kills: 97,285 / KDR: 2.68

WeAre138

I think the Nuke is too EASY to get. I've gotten plenty. It's not hard. Once you've gotten the Harrier, it's already over.

Alphabuster187

Not true, most Harriers get shotdown right away, even if you get CG it's still not guaranteed you'll get the nuke.

You wrote it not me.

__________________

Prestige: 10 / Rank: 70 / Kills: 97,285 / KDR: 2.68

WeAre138

25, WITHOUT killstreaks building is ridiculousy hard. With them building to each other, it is easy. Occasionally freak shit happens, but most people in GW don't bother shooting shit down. Once I've got my Harrier, I'm pretty much safe to get the nuke. Before I know it, I'm spawn raping with the CG (Cold Blooded or not)and the beautiful nuke symbol pops up.

With 25 kills being very difficult without killstreaks building, I lowered it to 20. The glove fits.

Voodoo

I think what he meant by not build was you need to get 20 straight kills reward unassisted for the nuke, which makes more sense than just lowering it to 20, which is dumb

__________________

My YouTube Channel

WeAre138

My bad, I forgot Sentry Gun.

Four kills - but don't have it be an airdrop. Seriously, no more airdrops. Just give me the damn thing.

oneinchwunda

lol.

GTFO.

__________________

Platy

Only thing I agree with is Killstreaks shouldn't build. Then only the good players will get the good killstreaks, not the campers who rely on their rewards.

Alpha, if you're going to argue someones point, don't take there answers out of context.

__________________

OzballO

Isn't there a thread about his already?

Alphabuster187

He put it into context after the fact... he should have started with that from the beginning.

__________________

Prestige: 10 / Rank: 70 / Kills: 97,285 / KDR: 2.68

Platy

So you can't read? or do you read what you want to read in order to try and be right?

Fully explaining his reasoning behind his idea.

__________________

NinJa

I also agree with killstreaks not chaining each other at all. Earned killstreaks would make the game more appealing IMO.

__________________

Lul Suspended | Forum Rules | TB PX21 Review | Userbar Pack

Vortel

Nukes are as common as muck these days, I don't find it enjoyable to Chopper rape opponents anymore to get a nuke. I generally use emergency airdrop to get the share package experience. Also think EMP is way too high and have never even considered using it, should be much lower.
I think most of the other killstreaks are rated quite well but they definately shouldnt count towards eachother.

__________________

beasTer

They had the right idea with making Care Package rewards not count. They really should have taken it a step further.

Alphabuster187

Like I said, let them build but make...

CG - 15 kills
AC-130 - 15 kills
Nuke - 30 kills

__________________

Prestige: 10 / Rank: 70 / Kills: 97,285 / KDR: 2.68

blub212212

i agree with this, and EMP at 11. since EMP can destroy all things in air and you can't calll in anything, it is a big advantage.
with this, killstreaks should chain. most of the time, unless the enemy team sucks, you cant get up to 30 with a CG/AC130. If you can, then you SHOULD have the nuke cuz the enemy team sucks.

__________________

TransparentOpacity

Did you know that they drop in a straight line; whichever way you are facing when you throw the marker?

And emp being lower than chopper and ac130 would be strange... because you could get a chopper at 15 and use it, and someone could get an emp at 11 and use it right after and all of a sudden the person who used the emp would have a major advantage, with the lower killstreak reward.

I think the stealth bomber should be 8, because it's completely outclassed by the pavelow.

I think precision airstrikes should be 5, because they suck.

__________________

WeAre138

I think Stealth Bomber should be 7, because Harriers can get twice as many kills. Yet another thing I forgot to write in my original post.

Vasq

Here's how I see it
UAV-3
Counter-UAV-4
Care Package-4
Predator-5
Precision Airstrike-5
Attack Helicopter-6
Harrier-8-Too good to be seven.
Stealth Bomber-8-Nowhere near as good as a pavelow.
Emergency Airdrop-9
Pavelow-9
Chopper Gunner, AC130 and EMP at 11. 15 is basicaly going for a nuke.
Nuke-13374893473872453827578437894783587939874987327842 873478934785948723587324858732547823785


Just kidding. Nuke is fine at 25.

pantstofry

i c wot u did thar

Or even 7. I love using the stealth bomber, but I don't use it cuz its 9, i mean a harrier can get more kills and its 7. If you put the stealth bomber on a good place, you can get some serious fun. Plus that emblem is BA

Vasq

Eh, I'd rather stick with my cold-blooded pro emblem. But, imagine a Stealth Bomber back in the Rust/Ground War days with Danger Close Pro

TransparentOpacity

Although, yes, the harrier can get a lot more kills than the stealth bomber, if it is shot down right away and if you didn't get any kills with the precision airstrike then, it doesn't help at all. The stealth bomber can't be shot down and is undetectable to radar, and in some circumstances it can kill an entire team. The stealth bomber should be at 8 and harrier at 7 imo.

__________________

AP0K4YPS3

Why don't they just lower all the killstreaks to 1? That would make sense too...

I like the harriers at 7 but the CG should be raised. I think the AC-130 should be lower than the CG so people might start using it.

__________________

Groudon poops on you.
/thread

OzballO

Then all those people who don't go for nukes would equip both, and absolutely rape everyone in the bum-hole. I know I would. I like where everything is at but then again I lag like a mo fo so i need them a little lower than what ya'lls suggest.